<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Targeting Negative Keywords To Attract Traffic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seanseo.com/keywords/targeting-negative-keywords/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seanseo.com/keywords/targeting-negative-keywords/</link>
	<description>SEO Tips and Social Media Advice &#124; SeanSEO</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 21:28:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Damien Ryan</title>
		<link>http://seanseo.com/keywords/targeting-negative-keywords/comment-page-1/#comment-11257</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Damien Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 09:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seanseo.com/?p=4040#comment-11257</guid>
		<description>Does this really work or is it a scam? LOL

I have seen these before, and they always are just lead ins to a positive review of a product. This then begs the question, is the review independant or or a scam written by the originator of the product - oh, what a tangle web we weave.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this really work or is it a scam? LOL</p>
<p>I have seen these before, and they always are just lead ins to a positive review of a product. This then begs the question, is the review independant or or a scam written by the originator of the product &#8211; oh, what a tangle web we weave.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don White</title>
		<link>http://seanseo.com/keywords/targeting-negative-keywords/comment-page-1/#comment-11213</link>
		<dc:creator>Don White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 21:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seanseo.com/?p=4040#comment-11213</guid>
		<description>I never considered targeting negative keywords to attract traffic.  Amazing! This old dog can still learn new tricks. This article is definitely going in my Learn and Earn notebook.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never considered targeting negative keywords to attract traffic.  Amazing! This old dog can still learn new tricks. This article is definitely going in my Learn and Earn notebook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elly</title>
		<link>http://seanseo.com/keywords/targeting-negative-keywords/comment-page-1/#comment-10834</link>
		<dc:creator>Elly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 01:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seanseo.com/?p=4040#comment-10834</guid>
		<description>Hi Sean

While I can understand how this method of advertising can work for some people who think differently than I do, for me personally I would never use &#039;scam&#039; to try and attract people.

I have seen this done so many times now that I wonder why people want to &quot;trick&quot; browsers to click on their sites and find that it isn&#039;t even about a scam. I feel this is false advertising and out of integrity. The first thing that I think is &quot;why does this person need to sensationalise his/her website to suck people in?, they must have a very sus product&#039; and I am out of there.

As I said, I like to be up front and honest. If a product is good, it shouldn&#039;t be too hard to get positive attention. Just my opinion.:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Sean</p>
<p>While I can understand how this method of advertising can work for some people who think differently than I do, for me personally I would never use &#8216;scam&#8217; to try and attract people.</p>
<p>I have seen this done so many times now that I wonder why people want to &#8220;trick&#8221; browsers to click on their sites and find that it isn&#8217;t even about a scam. I feel this is false advertising and out of integrity. The first thing that I think is &#8220;why does this person need to sensationalise his/her website to suck people in?, they must have a very sus product&#8217; and I am out of there.</p>
<p>As I said, I like to be up front and honest. If a product is good, it shouldn&#8217;t be too hard to get positive attention. Just my opinion.:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angus Turner</title>
		<link>http://seanseo.com/keywords/targeting-negative-keywords/comment-page-1/#comment-10574</link>
		<dc:creator>Angus Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 15:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seanseo.com/?p=4040#comment-10574</guid>
		<description>Hi Sean,

Even if we are targeting negative keywords the article will be positive about the product so I do not see a problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Sean,</p>
<p>Even if we are targeting negative keywords the article will be positive about the product so I do not see a problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Rasmussen</title>
		<link>http://seanseo.com/keywords/targeting-negative-keywords/comment-page-1/#comment-7351</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Rasmussen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 00:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seanseo.com/?p=4040#comment-7351</guid>
		<description>If you feel comfortable using this strategy, it can work well Wal. If you have nothing but honest information to provide, hopefully it will come across that way to other readers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you feel comfortable using this strategy, it can work well Wal. If you have nothing but honest information to provide, hopefully it will come across that way to other readers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  seanseo.com/keywords/targeting-negative-keywords/feed/ ) in 0.67221 seconds, on May 23rd, 2012 at 9:04 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 23rd, 2012 at 10:04 am UTC -->
