Comments on: The Low Down On Duplicate Content

By: Sean Rasmussen

Sean Rasmussen — Tue, 27 Jul 2010 04:29:29 +0000

Elly to the rescue again All fixed.

By: Peter Damien Ryan

Peter Damien Ryan — Tue, 27 Jul 2010 02:43:18 +0000

It is fairly easy to write a very similar page of contents for inclusion on a blog as well as a website.

I also had two gardening websites and they covered a lot of the same ground (pardon the pun) and I never saw any deleterious affects in traffic and so on.

It is with EzineArticles that duplicate material can get problematic. If you publish the article onto your blog/website first and then submit to them, they pick it up. So it pays to do the Ezine thing first and then use it on your site – and that seems OK

By: Peter Damien Ryan

Peter Damien Ryan — Tue, 27 Jul 2010 02:38:18 +0000

Most of the PLR pages I have seen are really poor quality. They usually need a total re-write. The only good thing about them is that they do give some ideas or different slants on a topic – and then you write your own based on the PLR main points.
It is different than outsourcing to say Elance – where you can control the content and specify requirements say for keyword density etc.

By: Bernadette Hay

Bernadette Hay — Tue, 27 Jul 2010 02:29:22 +0000

I wasn’t really very sure on what to change and how much to change website content to avoid duplicate content. I’ve heard different thoughts on what is duplicate and what’s not but this covers it well. I guess some of it comes down to just trying it and keeping track of statistics and results.

By: Elly

Elly — Tue, 27 Jul 2010 02:06:37 +0000

It is important to know the protocol around duplicate content.

There are some grey arees too but I think your tips on repurposing website content is excellent and it helps to know how to get more mileage out of our posts.